Criminal behaviour is a common area of interest amongst psychology students at Birmingham City University. Bobbie White, a regular name on The Psychological Perspective, is particularly interested in a phenomenon known as differential association. Here she gives her perspective…
To preface this blog, I want to talk a little about differential association. Such a theory suggests that crime is not only learned, but that it is learned through association with those who hold favourable views towards violating social norms (Newburn, 2017). Akers (1998) further suggests that associating with individuals who violate social or legal norms is a considerable factor in predicting delinquent behaviour (As cited in Laub and Sampson, 2001). It is thus thought that encouraging associations with peers who have more favourable societal attitudes will aid desistance in offenders (Gunnison, 2014). As such, when attempting to rehabilitate an offender it may be natural to discourage an individual from associating with unfavourable peers. The potential benefits of this will vary from case to case and indeed as is the case with all interventions should be considered on an individual level. I, myself, do not wish to make an absolute statement on such a method that has so many moving pieces, as I am no expert. Indeed, I can conceive of more circumstances than not when such an exercise is key to supporting an individual’s desistance from future crime.
Despite this, I feel that there is a level of blindsight that wider society has when it comes to practicing this. It is all too easy for us to say “Well they are a bad influence, stop associating with them” or “They’re going to get you in trouble”. Yes, perhaps they will but when considering crime and those who commit it, we are remiss to forget that acts and people do not occur in isolation. We are connected to our background and our society and who you see as ‘a bad influence’ may be the only person who was there to pull someone up at their lowest. The following is my own perspective of growing up in a deprived area rampant in crime… Perhaps it is different than you assumed.
The Stories You Don’t Hear
Shows like Benefit Street and Jeremy Kyle have thrived on the public’s fascination with ‘Poverty Porn’. This notion that poor people on benefits are a spectacle to be watched and exposed. If this blog entry feels biased, it’s because it is. I grew up in an underprivileged area of Birmingham and the cast of ‘characters’ shown on programmes like that were similar to people I have loved and known as neighbours. These shows often show the elements of poverty that make those with money stare at with shock, horror and a near masochistic amusement. This is done all whilst concealing another side to growing up underprivileged.
Compassion.
When you grow up with very little, sharing is the assumption. If you feel the pit of hunger in your stomach, there is a neighbour or an ‘aunt’ ready to pull you in and insist that you eat up before you go back out. This aunt or uncle won’t share your blood, but what does something like that matter? That aunt was a teenage mother the same as your own. That uncle a man who had a fight with your dad once, only to later help him out in need. Mentions of previous fallouts to be met with ‘ Naw, he’s alright he is’. These people share no blood relation to you, but they are aunts and uncles nevertheless and always ready to fight for you, to stand in your corner. Going to court and you need a suit? There’s an uncle for that. New mom and need a break? There’s an aunt to take your child for the night, or to come help clean your house. If you find yourself fighting with family, storming out of your home with tears streaking down your face and voice hoarse from screaming, there is always a place you can go. A household willing to take you in. An aunt calling your mother to let her know you’re ‘alright’ and that keeping you for the night is ‘never a problem’. You will be welcome to stay there until the ache calms and the tears settle. If your car won’t start in the morning, you can bet that there is a neighbour who will open it up and spend hours fixing it for you. Often offering money for such an act is met with indignation. No matter how much time spent fixing it, or how difficult the task, offering a monetary reward can be seen as crass. The act was not done for reward. It was done because often that person knows what it’s like to need help and to not have it.
“ You’re a guest, don’t be silly” Is a phrase I have heard more than once, but not from those of my background. This is because when you have nothing, anyone you welcome in is not a guest. They are, in some ways, family even if but for a small amount of time. I think nothing of making myself at home when at a friend’s from my background, and this is because I know we were both raised in a way that encourages such action. Of course, this also means there’s no slacking.
“Can I have some water?”
“Sure, you know where the cups are, get me some whilst you’re at it.”
If you see dinner being made for you, you come and help. If you can’t cook, you clean. If you can’t clean, you set the table. This level of familiarity is often there with all guests. If you don’t trust someone, the likelihood of them being brought into your home isn’t high. If you do trust someone, if that person is family in ways not involving blood, there is no part of your life that is denied to them. To many this way of living must be strange. Not waiting on a guest hand and foot is a social faux pa worthy of distaste, but to those growing up how I did it is a statement. Guests are welcomed for only a short period. Guests knock on the door and await entry. To family however, the door is always open and the welcome always warm.
Not all of my experiences have been positive. I have watched and seen acts of violence that other’s only know of from movies. I have seen knuckles bruised, obscenities shouted and noses red and twisted. I have felt relief that that was all that came to pass. That this time only hands and fists were thrown. I will not excuse this behaviour, but I refuse for this to be all that others think of when they think of poverty.
So, the next time you see deprivation and poverty, the next time you see a show where the ‘characters’ make you feel rage because you feel they don’t pull their weight, just remember there is a side you do not see. A welcome you have not felt, but should you need it, should you ever find yourself without anything and in need of kindness… You would find it.
Finally to finish this post off and to clarify, I am by no means saying that we should not discourage contact with criminal peers or social circles when necessary. I am trying to highlight the monumental weight that comes with such an action and the support that an individual may need if they are to do this. If we see ‘criminal peers’ as simply ‘bad’ and ignore the impact they have had on an individual’s life, than we risk being flippant and dismissive when working to help an individual make more positive choices going forward. Indeed, from an individual’s perspective, these circles who may not encourage ‘good’ behaviour, may also be the ones who offered care and compassion when an individual had nothing. Furthermore, often we as society greet those with a criminal record with coldness. We turn our backs instead of our cheeks and demand a better standard of behaviour before offering warmth. I do not envy those who are in the position of helping others reform themselves, because this is a monumental task. You cannot change society alone. You cannot undo the past, or isolate only the best elements of others. In spite of all you cannot do, there is something you can do – show empathy and consideration for those with experiences you have not had. Consider life from another perspective and the hardships that may come from being encouraged to leave behind those from your past.
For those of you who enjoy poetry, I encourage you to listen to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dg4x8vjbuA4. As you can see many of the experiences and feelings he expresses are also those shown throughout this post. This poem has always meant the world to me because it was one of the first pieces of media I came across that showed both sides to poverty and deprivation.
– Bobbie White, Department of Psychology, Birmingham City University












